How Digital Learning is Boosting Achievement

Learning / by

A reader commented that he wanted to get on board with digital learning but had been told there wasn’t much evidence of links to achievement. That’s dead wrong. There are hundreds of solid pieces of evidence about digital learning.

It’s true that investments to put 10 million computers in American schools did little to move the achievement needle in aggregate but that’s because it was layered on top of (or as Innosight would say, crammed into) the existing batch-print model of schooling. The same can be said for doubling staffing ratios over the last thirty years.

The potential of personalized learning technology—as evidenced in the military, gaming, corporate training, and informal learning—suggest the potential going forward is much greater that what we’ve seen to date. When technology is used to extend, personalize and transform learning, it makes a world of difference.

Following are a few dozen studies that demonstrate the promise of digital learning. The list of evidence above is is by no means an exhaustive. There are over a dozen academic journals dedicated to online learning research. We’d welcome your additions or favorite sources.

1. Blended schools achieve high performance:

  • Mooresville, NC has seen an improvement of 20 percentage points—from 68 percent to 88 percent—in the portion of its students who scored “proficient” on all core-subject state exams, in the subjects of reading, math, and science in the four years since its conversion to a 1-to-1 laptop program.
  • Rocketship Education elementary schools are top performing low-income schools in California in part because of a two hour computer learning lab.
  • Carpe Diem is a rotation model blended high school, and a top math performer in Arizona.
  • KIPP Empower: 95% of kindergartners scored at or above national in math and 96% in reading, while only 9% arrived kindergarten-ready.
  • AdvancePath: 90% enrolling in the blended learning dropout prevention network are likely to earn their high school diploma.
  • Robert A. Taft Information Technology High School, Cincinnati, was  converted to a technology-focused school and saw graduation rates skyrocket from about 21% to more than 95%.

2. Hundreds of studies of online and blended learning show efficacy:

3. Technology-enable math products have boosted achievement:

4. Digital learning offers the only path to boosting achievement in this “decade of deficits”:

  • In Digital Learning Imperative, the Alliance for Excellent Education first made the case that digital learning was the only solution to the achievement gap, the fiscal gap, and the effective teacher gap.
  • A recent U.S. Department of Education Study outlined nine ways that online learning can boost productivity.
  • The Florida Tax Watch evaluation of Florida Virtual School found, in addition to student achievement gains, that FLVS is “a bargain for Florida taxpayers. Largely because it has no expenses related to transportation or construction and maintenance of physical facilities, FLVS is able to offer computer-delivered instruction at a lower per-student cost than traditional schools.”

Digital learning will boost the percentage of US students that graduate ready for college and careers.  Internationally, the digital learning revolution offers the first opportunity in history to extend quality secondary to every young person on the planet.

Venture investor Ram Shriram in a recent interview said, “There is an important change that is finally happening [in K-12] thanks to broadband ,…tablets, and the kinds of things we are building in the Cloud…these things finally allow for democratization of knowledge. We can have each child learn at his or her own pace. It allows us to spread the best teachers, and best methods everywhere. We can lower the cost of education for those who are less able to afford it.”

Tom Vander Ark

Tom Vander Ark

Tom is author of Getting Smart: How Digital Learning is Changing the World and founder of GettingSmart.com. Tom is also a partner in Learn Capital, a venture capital firm investing in learning content, platforms, and services with the goal of transforming educational engagement, access, and effectiveness.

5 Comments

Sandra Turner /

I want to add our small program to the list. We offer distance literacy training to First Nations people in urban, remote and rural communities in Ontario. Without our program, learners would not be moving on to employment, achieving their high school diploma, or going on to community college. There is no telling what the future holds for our learners. Thank you for this article.

Hatch Early Learning (@HatchEarlyChild) /

Thank you for inquiring about Hatch Early Learning. We develop educational technology learning systems for early learners (mainly pre-k through grade 1). Our focus is on developing interactive learning games based on the skills and content areas research shows young children need competency on for school success; with learning systems on all major platforms including IWBS, touchscreen computers, tablets, and multi-touch tables. We are also committed to outcomes-based research and have conducted to date two efficacy studies both of which found children using the systems made statistically significant gains on externally valid and reliable measures in language/literacy and math (http://www.hatchearlychildhood.com/layout-images/documents/Resources/iSSEfficacyPreview.pdf and http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED528703.pdf )

Lilla Dale Mcmanis, PHD | Research Director
Hatch Early Learning
HatchEarlyLearning.com

Carri Schneider /

Thanks Sandra and Lilla for sharing information about your programs. We are always on the lookout for innovative ways to meet student needs and improve results!

Mark Windschitl /

In responding to claims about technology and learning, it is always important to read the original research and to understand what it is really saying. For example, with regard to the U.S. Department of Education’s Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. The latter half of the abstract is composed entirely of cautions/caveats. It states for example: “The difference between student outcomes for online and face-to-face classes—measured as the difference between treatment and control means, divided by the pooled standard deviation—was larger in those studies contrasting conditions that blended elements of online and face-to-face instruction with conditions taught entirely face-to-face. Analysts noted that these blended conditions often included additional learning time and instructional elements not received by students in control conditions. This finding suggests that the positive effects associated with blended learning should not be attributed to the media, per se. An unexpected finding was the small number of rigorous published studies contrasting online and face-to-face learning conditions for K–12 students. In light of this small corpus, caution is required in generalizing to the K–12 population because the results are derived for the most part from studies in other settings (e.g., medical training, higher education).” The critical reader can see that the conclusions are far from straightforward.

Tom Vander Ark /

When reading research it’s important to remembers it’s all rear view mirror. The ED study is all from the last decade. The ability to personalize learning has dramatically improved in the last 24 months and will be much better 24 months from now.